top of page
To test this feature, visit your live site.
What do you think should city wait for a year and sign Haaland or buy Kane in The Summer Window.
What do you think should city wait for a year and sign Haaland or buy Kane in The Summer Window.
9 answers1 reply
Comments (10)
bottom of page
kane. less cost, more experience and also kane is already a long time premiere league player so i think he would be better for them
Kane 😍
Kane. De Bruyne And Kane 🤤
Kane for sure because if they don't buy him then Manchester United might which will strengthen them...also he is more proven and in the same league...although Waiting for haaland could also be an option but I don't think city need him when they have
Wait for a year and sign Haaland instead. City won the league without a striker so I am sure they can do it again. Also Haaland is a long term investment
I think they will go for kane as guardialo doesnt like mino railo from past and that plays a big role for buying haaland
Kane is the best option for City. He is already well established in PL.
CAN SIGN KANE AS A REPLACEMENT OF AGUERO
Should sign kane!